Showing posts with label Doodling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Doodling. Show all posts

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Tim Burton & Matthew Gray Gubler & Stuff

The two people above seem an unlikely couple to coexist in any textual space; however they do have something in common besides my apparent interest in them. 

I went to Tate Modern again yesterday because it was Friday and on Fridays some museums in London choose to treat their patrons by staying open late, till 10pm in Tate Modern's case (and the sandwiches in the museum cafe in late hours, like an out-of-fashion artist, decide to trade for a reduced price too.) I love museums, a passion not shared by everyone I meet - quite a pity for I think everyone should love museums, regardless of his or her level of interest in Picasso and whatnot, for three reasons. 

First, they are free, mostly, in London, unless you really die to view a current exhibition which always charges a handsome fee or your guilty conscience would never allow you to bypass the donation box placed at the museum entrance without reaching for your wallet. 

Second, most museums promise a great escape with their aesthetically pleasing and architecturally interesting, large and open spaces to urban dwellers, the majority of whom spilt their lives between dreadful office cubicles and cookie-cutter characterless apartments. Think of the lofty, light-infused great hall of the British Museum, the historic, imposing central hall of the Natural History Museum, the awe-evoking, raw, industrial Turbine Hall of Tate Modern. Think of the many varied spaces, large and small, throughout the museums, usually no short of benches, armchairs and couches eagerly inviting one to stop, sit, linger, loiter, rest, watch, appreciate, anything but to hurry and be hurried, like in shops/cafes by over-zealous and oftentimes intrusive staff. 


Last but not the least, museum shops! Commercialized art, or art merchandise, things having a lot  or little to do with art, or things priced exorbitantly in the name of art, whatever you describe it. Despicable they might be, I find them very therapeutic and soothing, which has little to do with whether you can or want to afford to buy anything. The selection, the display, the color, the space! Everything seems mesmerizingly reachable, and at the same time also seems a bit too refined to regard them in the context of one's own home.

Okay, I have digressed enough and shall return to my visit to Tate Modern, more specifically, to its store. Among a sea of glossy, beautifully-covered books, I saw this book by Tim Burton, The Melancholy Death of Oyster Boy & Other Stories, lying there with a modest dark blue cover. I have known the book for a few years - first published in 1997, the book is 12 years old already-, and have been tempted to pick up a pricy hardcover copy in a NYC bookstore a couple of times but was never resolved enough to do it, especially after I found a full electronic copy online. I got to know the book when I didn't even know who Tim Burton was despite his fame and statue in Hollywood. I was attracted by his style of drawings and storytelling, a style very adeptly described by New York Times as:
"The Melancholy Death of Osyter Boy exquisitely conveys the pain of an adolescent outsider. Like Tim Burton's movies, the work manages to be both childlike and sophisticated, blending the innocent with the Macabre."
Seeing the book quietly snuggled among some colorful children's picture books - I highly question the appropriateness of categorizing it as children's book by Tate Modern - I was suddenly overcome by a feeling one often experiences in childhood for a long-coveted toy or chocolate bar. I brought the book to the cashier without much hesitation though it was not cheaper than the hardcover copy I came across years ago.

Here is a poem with the accompanying cartoon from the book:

The Pin Cushion Queen

Life isn't easy 
for the Pin Cushion Queen,
When she sits alone on her throne,
Pins push through her spleen.
 
This kind of morbid twist on childlike stories is easily reminiscent of the works of Edward Gorey (Gorey's entry in Wikipedia confirms the influence of Gorey on Burton's directional style), who decades before Burton's little book painted a more gruesome picture of the deaths of the "gashlycrumb tinnies". Here is one of the deaths:

Gorey is one of my favorite illustrators; but I only own two books of his: his books are hard to find,  being one excuse. I adore his dexterous and meticulous use of lines, his ability to build up an otherworldly atmosphere in which his odd characters live, his masterly use of meager words alongside his drawings. 

So why Matthew Gray Gubler? And, more important, who is he? He is nobody or a rather obscure actor/former fashion model to most people. He is Agent Spencer Reid/genius to anyone who is a fan like I am of the US TV crime drama series "Criminal Minds". He is also a quite talented sketch artist, only known to the few who happen to have visited his personal website which displays many of his works or doodles - he is the designer of the website too. The ghastly nature of his sketches supplies an interesting yet surprisingly complimentary facet to the nerdy Dr. Reid character - somehow I find it hard to separate his TV persona from his real life one; I would like to think he's playing himself though I perfectly know the real Gubler, smart he may be, is not a genius. 

So finally here is the connection between Tim Burton and Matthew Gray Gubler, that they are both in the show-biz and they both have a less-known artistic talent in drawing, sketching, illustrating, whatever you call it and an aesthetic taste in and inclination for things that are not so cute-and-cheerful. There is something else I envy in them both:  that their fame - not so much yet for MGG- as a result of their career in film or TV helps to bring to light their other artistic endeavors, which otherwise more likely than not will sink to obscurity, for neither of the two, as much as I admire them, stand great chance of prospering based solely on their drawing/sketching skills. But lucky for them, and for me too, they are keeping their day jobs. For MGG, I would buy his book if he ever decides to publish one.

Friday, January 16, 2009

今天的素描练习

sigh,原本一个青春美少年被我画成了风霜老大叔,而且还是那种中年失意的大叔。
总结原因有三:
1、鼻子画长了
2、嘴唇画的不够丰满
3、眼睛被画小了。
借口有一:坐着画容易比例失调。
越看越象刘德华+吴奇隆,好失败。

来学习一下大师的人像画,Van Gogh的众多自画像之一。虽然是幅油画,但我觉得更象drawing, 只是工具是oil。那些鲜活大胆不安分的线条,仿佛彩色的虫子,随时会蠕动起来。画中人紧蹙的眉头、眼下的青色阴影、蓝色玻璃球般的眼睛和红色的执拗的乱须,这是1889年的Van Gogh,36岁,患抑郁症,已经住进了位于法国南部Saint-Remy的一家精神病院内。这个时期的他的画充满了标志性的大大小小的旋涡,最广为人知的就是“The Starry Night"了;一年后,他将一颗左轮手枪的子弹送入了自己的胸膛。

Thursday, January 15, 2009

第一天上课

做了一早上上课迟到或是忘带工具的噩梦,可见好久没进过课堂的我有多么紧张。6点之后一直就没睡踏实,半梦半醒着熬到了8点多起床。慌慌张张的出了门,结果提前15分钟就到了画室,是班上的第一个。

10点整,学生都到齐了,大概15人左右,老老少少的,心中窃喜:俺在这儿还不算是高龄的。

第一天的授课内容是人体素描,着重于线条和结构,工具是木炭条和铅笔。一天下来,发现画画还真是一件体力活,我老胳膊老腿儿,站的腰酸背疼的。可是老师说站姿比较好,整个画室也只有一个孕妇是坐着的,我也就没好意思坐下。

早上画了三张素描,模特每30分钟变换一个姿势,下午是画一张大幅的素描。因为阴影和色彩是今后课程的内容,所以基本上就在画线条和空间。


Tuesday, December 9, 2008

素描真难

知难而进。只是委屈了周迅姑娘,本来一个精致的人物,被我画的很粗糙。